Wednesday, June 5, 2019

Westchester County's Top Ten Views

Ben and I have lived in Port Chester, NY for close to a year now. One of the many benefits of living here is the access we have to gorgeous natural areas. To the east lies the rocky shore of the Long Island Sound. The western edge of the county is marked by the wide and mighty Hudson River, including parts of its scenic highlands. The northern reaches of the county include scenic reservoirs, rural roads, and peaceful quiet. And when we crave a culture fix, all we have to do is cross the county's southern border to end up in NYC with its endless fascinations.

This beauty can be taken in from scenic viewpoints located all over the county. Here are my top ten favorite Westchester views.

10. Chestnut Ridge Hawkwatch

Image result for chestnut ridge hawkwatch

The Chestnut Ridge Hawkwatch is part of the Arthur W. Butler Memorial Sanctuary which is maintained by the Nature Conservancy and located near Mt. Kisco. Wooden bleachers sit at the top of a ridge, providing a nice perch for birdwatchers on the lookout for raptors. The view of the birds and rolling hills is diminished by the highway noise from I-684, located just below.

9. Rockwood Hall


The stone foundation on which we're sitting is all the remains of Rockwood Hall, an old gilded age mansion just north of Tarrytown. Now it's part of the larger Rockefeller State Park and Preserve. There's a wonderful loop hike that passes through the remains of the manor, winds through the woods, and parallels the train tracks by the river. It also looks like a great place to sled in the wintertime.

8. Larchmont Manor Park


Residents of an upscale Larchmont neighborhood own and operate Larchmont Manor Park, which is open for public use. Picnicking and ball-playing are prohibited, but visitors are welcome to walk around the paths, sit in the gazebos, and take in the sweeping views of the Sound. The park provides one of the few public access points to the Sound in Westchester County and is the only one that offers nearby free street parking in the summer.

7. Kensico Dam


The Kensico Dam contains over a million cubic feet of stone, more than some of the pyramids in Egypt. It was completed in 1917 and the reservoir that it holds back provides some of NYC's water. It's over 300 feet tall so climbing the steps from bottom to top offers a solid workout. The plaza below the dam hosts a number of ethnic festivals in the summer months including the Jewish cultural festival.

6. Pierson Park


Pierson Park in Tarrytown provides direct Hudson River access and sweeping views of the new Tappan Zee Bridge. The park is part of the much longer Hudson River Greenway, which parallels the Hudson all through the county. The section here is pristinely maintained with wide paths, pretty plants, and fun amenities for the whole family like a pool, a playground, a restaurant, and a cafe/ice cream stand. Sunset is a particularly nice time here.

5. Turkey Mountain


Located in Yorktown Heights, Turkey Mountain is one of those hikes that offers a solid payoff in terms of views along with a solid workout as the trail quickly climbs a couple hundred feet. From the summit it's possible to see the Manhattan skyline, the Croton Reservoir, and the Hudson River.

4. Ward Pound Ridge


Ward Pound Ridge, in the northeastern corner of the county, is Westchester's largest park. It's a quiet and peaceful place that feels a world away from the hubbub of the NYC metro area. The hike we took passed by this sweeping view of the Cross River Reservoir and brought us inside a cave used by the mysterious Leatherman of Westchester and Connecticut.

3. Bear Mountain State Park


Bear Mountain State Park provides views of Westchester County even though it is not in Westchester County. While the 360 degree vista from the Perkins Memorial Tower at the summit is impressive, I prefer the scenic overlook at a slightly lower elevation of the Bear Mountain Bridge and Anthony's Nose, one of Westchester County's highest points. The hike to that summit is quite steep and strenuous, so for people who are in less good shape, are short on time, or are not wearing hiking clothes, driving to this viewpoint on the other side of the river is a great alternative.

2. Playland Pier


One of the more accessible parts of the Sound in Westchester is the Playland. This historic amusement park features a boardwalk, bars and restaurants, art deco buildings, amusement rides including an old wooden roller coaster, and this lovely fishing pier. The light just before sunset enhances the nostalgic beauty of the place.

1. Croton Gorge Park




My favorite Westchester view is the waterfall in Croton Gorge Park. We were lucky to visit on a quiet, beautiful day. The combination of the massive dam, the arched bridge, and the rushing waterfall make for quite a dramatic site. The walk to the top is relatively easy and offers a sweeping view of the reservoir and a better sense of how the spillway works. We even saw a rainbow in the rapids. 


Sunday, June 2, 2019

A Tale of Two Yeows: Reviewing non-traditional revivals of Oklahoma! at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival and on Broadway


“Let people say we’re in love,” the chorus sings exultantly at the end of the Oregon Shakespeare Festival's production of Oklahoma! As the ensemble disperses this love all the way to the back row of the audience, a rainbow-colored moon descends from the ceiling. Laurey the farm girl, after struggling to express her sexuality, marries her beloved wife, the charming cowhand Curly, in a ceremony marked by celebration and acceptance from their community. Not even a drunk, homophobic Jud, who falls on his own knife after Curly fails to stop him from committing suicide, can dampen the festivities.

Image result for oregon shakespeare festival oklahoma
The OSF ensemble joyously sings "Oklahoma!"
Then the cast bows and belts out a rousing reprise of the title number. When they reach the lyric, “We know we belong to the land, and the land we belong to is grand,” they declare that LGBTQ people have a claim on America and its promise of equality. Their final, jubilant “Yeow!” invites the audience to cheer for the country’s increasing acceptance and inclusion.

Though the audience still claps, probably out of habit, perhaps a more appropriate response to the venomous, angry “Yeow!” that concludes the current Broadway revival of Oklahoma! is stunned silence. Laurey the farm girl, after struggling to express her sexuality, has married the trigger-happy cowman Curly; maybe because she loves him, maybe because he offers her greater protection on the chaotic frontier, or maybe because she has no other option; in a ceremony marked by violence and bloodshed. A calm, well-dressed Jud arrives at the scene, kisses Laurey, and gives Curly a gun as a wedding present. Jud seems to take a step toward Curly and Curly shoots, killing Jud, his blood splattering over Curly and Laurey’s white wedding outfits.

Image result for wedding oklahoma broadway revival
Curly and Laurey's wedding outfits will soon become blood-stained
The “Oklahoma” reprise that follows the hastily assembled murder trial, during which Laurey’s Aunt Eller sinisterly threatens the federal marshal unless he lets Curly off the hook, is sung with tortured ambiguity, an intensification of Laurey’s internal struggles throughout the play. When they sing, “We know we belong to the land, and the land we belong to is grand” it sounds like an unsettling question rather than a confident expression of belonging. Their scowling faces and aggressive body language suggest that America can’t honestly promise sunny optimism, but only confusion and brokenness, from the barrel of a gun.

Image result for oklahoma oregon shakespeare
OSF's Oklahoma! ensemble featured gender non-conforming performers
The contrasting “Yeows!” demonstrate that non-traditional productions of this old warhorse of a musical can draw out drastically different meanings from it. Director Bill Rauch’s Oregon production is non-traditional because of its casting: Curly is played by a woman as a woman, Ado Annie becomes Ado Andy and is played by a man, Aunt Eller is trans, Ali Hakim is bisexual, and the ensemble features gender non-conforming performers. Jud remains a man. But beyond the casting, some significant changes to the dream ballet, and mostly trivial revisions of the script around things like gender pronouns and “cowman” becoming “cowhand,” the production is a standard interpretation of the material with conventional staging, familiar orchestrations, and period costumes.

Daniel Fish’s Broadway production maintains the traditional gendered casting, but otherwise makes much more significant deviations from how Oklhaoma! is usually presented. It features a stripped down cast of just 12, re-orchestrates the score to have a bluegrass sound, uses anachronistic costumes and props—the hampers prepared by the women are Coleman coolers rather than frilly baskets, keeps the lights on the audience for most of the show, has guns hanging from the wall as the most prominent part of the scenery, and reworks the dream ballet into a virtuosic, one-woman, modern dance piece.

Image result for ali stroker oklahoma
Ali Stroker as Ado Annie
Both productions should be credited for their inclusive casting decisions. In addition to LGBTQ representation in the Oregon production, black actors play Curly and Will, an actor of Middle Eastern descent plays Ali Hakim, and the ensemble features many performers of color. On Broadway, Laurey and her dream counterpart are played by black performers, and two male actors of color have small speaking roles. Ado Annie is played by Ali Stroker, the first wheelchair user to perform on Broadway. Her twangy “I Cain’t Say No” brings the house down. The empowered sexuality she brings to the role pushes against negative stereotypes of people with disabilities as sexless or undesirable. While it was fun to watch Ado Andy sing that song too, popular culture does not lack portrayals of oversexed gay men.

Image result for oregon shakespeare festival oklahoma
Royer Bockus and Tatiana Wechsler as Laurey and Curly
Another characteristic shared by both productions is the close attention they pay to Laurey. This makes sense: the central conflict of the show is Laurey’s choice between Curly and Jud. In the Oregon production, this choice could have been easy for Laurey. She is gay. Curly is female. Jud is male. But Laurey is still coming to terms with her sexuality. A question left by the script of Oklahoma! is why Laurey lives with her Aunt Eller and not with her parents. This production suggests an answer: she may have been running away from a home that rejected her for being gay and found a safe place to live with her trans aunt in a more affirming community. So Laurey’s ambivalence toward Curly has less to do with her attraction to Jud, and more with how the trauma of the closet continues to weigh on her psychology. In this production, “People Will Say We’re in Love” becomes much more than a coy love song. Laurey knows that there could be consequences for her if people knew she loved a woman.

Image result for oklahoma oregon shakespeare
A happy moment in the "Dream Ballet"
before Jud turns it into a nightmare
This sub-text becomes text in the reimagined dream ballet. Dream-Jud is dangerous not because he represents unrestrained sexuality, but because he signifies homophobia and transphobia. In this version, the can-can girl sequence of Agnes De Mille’s original choreography starts when Jud menacingly forces Laurey’s gender non-conforming friends to change clothes. Laurey is truly afraid of how Jud might hurt her or Curly, which is why she ultimately decides to go to the box social with him. When Laurey fires Jud in act two, it’s portrayed as a moment of liberated empowerment. She overcomes internalized and external homophobia to finally let the world know that she and Curly are in love.

When Jud returns to crash their wedding, he sneers at Curly, saying he has a present for the “groom,” which is the only time the production opts not to change the gendered terms of the script. Jud starts to attack Curly but then appears to turn the knife onto himself. The audience sees Curly grab the knife to stop Jud from killing himself, but in the resulting scuffle, Jud falls on it and dies. The other characters do not see the same details as the audience, but Curly is nonetheless acquitted in a humorous trial. Aunt Eller still threatens the marshal, but it’s funny rather than sinister. Though the threat posed by Jud is subdued by his death, the final scene reads as a reminder that even with increased acceptance, the threat of violence against LGBTQ people remains.

But this production insists on a happy ending, something too few queer characters get. The closing image of the rainbow moon over a now-wed Laurey and Curly represents the comfort and love so many LGBTQ people find with their chosen families after experiencing what can be painful rejection. Laurey’s story of ultimate belonging is exuberantly reflected in the singing of “Oklahoma” and punctuated with its final “Yeow!”. This production presents an aspirational vision for an ever more inclusive America.

Image result for gabrielle hamilton oklahoma
Gabrielle Hamilton dances the re-imagined "Dream Ballet"
The depiction of Laurey on Broadway offers a much darker, though possibly a more realistic, depiction of America as a bewildering and violent country. This Laurey seems to know that her fate on the plains is tied up with the whims of the belligerent men who surround her. She feels intense sexual desire for them, but she knows sex could be dangerous. Romance is distant. The dream ballet dancer, representing Laurey’s psyche and wearing a sparkly shirt that says “Dream Baby Dream”, is voracious, galloping around the stage like a horse, making eyes at the audience, flirting with male and female figures on stage, and helping Laurey pleasure herself, all as an electric guitar plays a distorted and almost hostile rendition of the score. It looks and sounds completely different from De Mille’s original choreography, but just as in the original, it translates Laurey’s id into thrilling movement.

Image result for oklahoma broadway revival
The audience is invited onstage for chili during intermission
The lighting also calls attention to Laurey’s arc, uncovers new insight into Curly and Jud, and narrows the gap between audience and performers. The lights are up on the audience for almost the entire show. This choice makes the audience part of the community depicted on stage, which otherwise would feel insubstantial due to the small cast. Audience members literally take the stage during intermission to eat chili simmering in crockpots and the cornbread that Aunt Eller and Laurey prepared at the beginning of the act. The lights also implicate the audience in the happenings of the show. We become auction participants, wedding guests, and witnesses to Jud’s killing. But because the show is performed in the round, audience members may draw different conclusions about the actions on stage based on their seat locations, mirroring how cell-phone video and dash-cam footage of contemporary shooting deaths simultaneously turn us all into witnesses while offering competing perspectives.

Image result for rebecca naomi jones oklahoma
Damon Daunno and Rebecca Naomi Jones as Curly and Laurey
The lighting occasionally changes, signifying tension and drama. When Curly sings the third verse of “Surry with the Fringe on Top” about the sun swimmin’ on the rim of a hill, an eerie green light floods the stage, not the purplish-red sunset lighting that we might expect, and which was used for this moment in the Oregon production. At the end of “Many a New Day,” which Laurey sings spitefully rather than playfully (in Oregon, Laurey tap-danced), when she croons about many a red sun setting, the same green light returns. Hammerstein’s poetic, romantic lyrics become murkier in green, evoking something disquieting about Curly and Laurey’s feelings for one another, like an Oklahoma sky before a tornado strikes.

Image result for oklahoma revival
Red club lighting during "People Will Say We're in Love"
Red light does fill the stage during Curly’s verse of “People Will Say we’re in Love,” but it’s the artificial light of a rockabilly club, not the natural light of the outdoors. Curly sings it as a knowing performance—Laurey mentions that Curly is playing guitar, which he had done earlier during “O, What a Beautiful Morning” and “Surrey with the Fringe on Top” without any of the other characters commenting. In other productions of Oklahoma!, including the one in Oregon, Curly’s observation: “your hand feels so grand in mine,” is a moment of vulnerability, an honest expression of a private feeling, not something visible that people could then gossip about all day behind their doors. Here though, it’s sung with ironic detachment, as Laurey sarcastically dances in front of him. The song still ends on a note of sexual tension between the two, but the romance is far less secure.

An erotic moment at the end of "Poor Jud is Daid"
The most striking lighting choice occurs in the very next scene, when Curly confronts Jud in his smokehouse. The lights suddenly go out, leaving the entire theater, including the actors on stage, in total darkness. In this production, the smokehouse isn’t creepy because of its dirt and pornography, but rather because of the anxious one-upmanship between Curly and Jud, expressed only through their voices. When Curly taunts Jud with “Poor Jud is Daid,” a camera streams an extreme close-up of Jud’s face, which is projected onto the back wall of the stage. Patrick Vaill’s performance as Jud during this scene is stunning, conveying at once pride, insult, anger, and sadness as Curly describes what his funeral would be like. A single tear falls from his eye. The song ends with Curly’s and Jud’s lips just an inch apart, a haunting, sexually charged image.

Curly’s drive for sex and violence is just as pronounced as Jud’s, but his popularity and charm make others in the community—except for perhaps Laurey—more willing to overlook those darker features of his character. Jud is not granted the same leeway. His “Lonely Room” soliloquy that follows reveals his deep desire for belonging in this community that sees him as unwanted and scary. Because of the sexually charged nature of these plains, Jud seems to believe he can find that belonging only by winning over Laurey.

Image result for oklahoma broadway revival
The cast's colorful costumes during "The Farmer and the
Cowman Should be Friends"
The stage goes black once more in the second act. Jud and Laurey are alone after Curly embarrasses him by winning Laurey’s hamper at the auction, during which Jud bid two years’ worth of savings for it. Unlike in other productions, Jud participates in the “Farmer and the Cowman” sequence before the auction, even smiling along with everyone else. But while most others onstage wear a color that connects them to another character—Laurey and Curly in blue, Will and Ado Annie in yellow—Jud’s blue and brown checkered shirt is matched only by Ali Hakim. The costuming communicates to the audience that these characters are outsiders; the way they are treated during the auction surfaces their outsider feelings all the more so.

So when Jud and Laurey are alone, he has one further shot at gaining the belonging he so craves. The lights go pitch black as Jud tenderly shares memories of when Laurey took care of him when he was sick. The audience hears Jud go in for a kiss and it sounds like Laurey kisses him back. The darkness leaves it ambiguous as to whether she gave her kiss with consent. We hear Jud start to unbuckle his belt. The lights go on again and Laurey pulls away, firing Jud and sending him away from the community.

They stay on when Jud returns to crash Curly and Laurey’s wedding. He says he has a present for the groom but first wants to kiss the bride. He actually kisses Laurey with no apparent resistance from her. Is she scared into submission? Does she still harbor some desire for Jud, even after marrying Curly? The whole sequence is disconcerting, ending with Curly shooting Jud, maybe in self-defense, and blood staining Curly and Laurey’s wedding clothes. It all takes place in full, bright light, but it’s uncertain what actually happens.

Image result for patrick vaill oklahoma
Damon Daunno, Rebecca Naomi Jones, and Patrick Vaill as
Curly, Laurey, and Jud
In total, these lighting choices unearth different potential motivations for Jud, Curly, and Laurey while keeping the text intact. The production does not absolve Jud for believing his ticket to acceptance lies exclusively in how one woman feels about him, but the lighting helps the audience understand what exclusion feels like viscerally. It strips Curly of his status as the ur-Romantic Hero of the American Musical canon, by revealing the dark and unsafe sides of his personality.

The lighting also suggests that whatever romance Laurey might feel for Curly and Jud is not obvious to her or to the audience, right up until the very end. Laurey and Curly’s marriage remains symbolic of Oklahoma’s ‘marriage’ into the United States, but instead of being hopeful, the union is more unsure, self-conscious, and dangerous. The lighting helps the audience feel both Laurey’s personal ambivalence about her life circumstances and relationships as well as ambivalence toward what it means to be American. It all becomes nearly unbearable for Laurey and the rest of the ensemble during the final reprise of “Oklahoma,” culminating in their scathing “Yeow!”

The conflicting interpretations of the same material in these productions suggest that classic musical theater can be as robust as Shakespeare, open to all kinds of experiments. These particular interpretative choices; one which makes Oklahoma! an aspirational show about American belonging (à la Hamilton) and one that does not flinch from the American reality of violence, sex, and power (à la the oeuvre of Arthur Miller); have contemporary political resonance. Indeed, these productions can be seen as proxies for the opposing strategies seen so far in the 2020 presidential election.

Image result for buttigieg beto bidenA candidate like Pete Buttigieg, who emphasizes hope and belonging from the stump, earnestly believes in American values and sees them as a positive force in the world, and has a more-or-less traditional marriage save for the gender of his spouse, aligns almost perfectly with the conventionally staged world of the OSF production and its message of inclusion. Beto O’Rourke says his meetings with regular folks on the campaign trail make him feel optimistic about the future of the country. OSF’s Oklahoma! had a similar impact on audience members. Joe Biden, who calls Trump an aberrant figure in American political life, could reasonably say the same thing about this Jud.

Image result for warren sandersOther candidates evoke the themes of the Broadway revival. Elizabeth Warren, who grew up in Oklahoma, foregrounds how Washington corruption ensures that only the well-connected have their interests protected. Such corruption occurs right in the open on Broadway as Aunt Eller uses her influence to get Curly cleared of murder. Bernie Sanders speaks out against the military industrial complex and actually uses the term, intimating that America is structured in a fundamentally violent way, just as Broadway’s Oklahoma! does.

Image result for maga hatTo be sure, these candidates are not as fatalistic about America as the production is—they are still running for president after all, which implies a belief that under their leadership, circumstances could improve. In a disturbing way, then, Trump could be the 2020 presidential candidate most aligned with the world depicted in this Oklahoma! His evocation of “American carnage” along with the hostile attitude he exhibits toward outsiders make it plausible that Curly and Aunt Eller would wear MAGA hats to the next box social.

Laurey, as is her way, would probably be less certain of which candidate to support. Likewise, had she been in the audience at OSF and on Broadway, she might struggle to say which she enjoyed more. But while politics would force Laurey to choose just one person, as the plot of the musical does, the richness and flexibility of theater would allow her to dream, baby, dream as she made up her mind about her favorite Oklahoma!, or not.

Image result for what the constitution means to me debate
Thursday Williams and Heidi Schreck debate at the end of
What the Constitution Means to Me
Broadway audiences this season are lucky that a different version of this deliberation about the meaning of America occurs just a few blocks away from Oklahoma! At the end of What the Constitution Means to Me, Heidi Schreck and a high school-aged girl debate whether or not to abolish the constitution. Is the American system fundamentally flawed, incapable of recognizing the humanity of outsiders? Or is it possible that the constitution’s core message of “We the People” can be expanded? The answer could be different in every performance.

So too with our reactions to these Oklahomas! and their “Yeows!” On days following mass shootings, in the aftermath of white supremacist violence, when confronting pervasive sexual assualt, and while fighting all forms of injustice, we should be honest about the shortcomings of the American dream and make sure those in power hear about it with our raw and persistent “Yeow!” But that wave of anger can be joined by other emotions. All together, these feelings can help us find the courage to be optimistic enough to work toward an America in which more people feel a sense of belonging. Doing that work is not easy, but sprinkling it with an occasional, joyful “Yeow!” might help.

Friday, April 3, 2015

Guest post from Shira Olson: Spring Spectacular!

Da da da da da Da da da da da Da da da da da da! “Start spreading the news, I’m leaving today…” New York, New York!

It’s a song that I’ve pretended for years to know every word to, but like the audience at “The Rockettes New York Spring Spectacular” I was lost during the group sing-a-long until the lyrics were posted up on the big screen. But oh what fun it was to smile, cheer, and laugh along with every fumble we collectively made.

The show that got dumped on in the NY Times review (“...this numbingly overblown 90-minute infomercial for the city that never sleeps threatened to send me into a waking coma…) is a show I quite enjoyed. It’s an advertisement for New York City in the most cliche way, yet as soon as we bought the tickets to the show we knew we were setting ourselves up for a cheesy, over the top phenomenon. If you know me you know that I’m a sucker for phenomenons, especially pop culture ones. There was glitz, there was glam, there was a humbling, albeit pretty ridiculous, plot line, great dancing, good singing, and of course, some high kicking.

This was my first time at Radio City Music Hall. What a magnificently huge theater. I saw the show with my brother and two close friends of mine who were visiting NYC for the first time. The theme of the show was quite appropriate for our group. I had been playing tour guide all weekend and got to take a break for Bernie (the character who’s NY sightseeing company was being threatened by digital takeover) to show us around. And I was thrilled to do so.

I actually found an important message in the midst of the stupidity of this all. Laura Benanti’s character, Jenna, is a big time CEO and entrepreneur. Jenna has plans to buy out Bernie’s tour bus company and virtualize the whole New York City experience. Derek Hough, an Angel named Jack sent by God aka Whoopi Goldberg’s voice (cue protest poster from “Hair” that reads: I saw God and she’s Black) to intervene and save the bus company. If he succeeds he will be rewarded with wings. High stakes job, Whoopi Godberg.

The show exists for tourists and more importantly, children. There’s no question that virtual experiences have taken over. In fact, I wonder how many of the children in the audience have had more memorable digital experiences than real life ones. In the Spring Spectacular Bernie has to prove to Jenna and the audience there there is nothing that compares to the “real thing”. What we see and get out of technology can’t be shared in the same ways of what we see by doing. Some may argue that by going to this show, with large technological elements and sets of New York City landmarks, I was doing the opposite of the “real thing”. But I say I was seeing a theatrical work in the greatest city of all that inspired me to feel giddy and youthful and send me away with a takeaway. Put your phone down and do something with real people!!!

The show’s big opener is set to “Welcome to New York” by Taylor Swift (BTW if you don’t  listen to 1989 at least five times a week you’re doing something wrong) . The Rockettes danced and sang inside Grand Central Station as Jack arrived in the Big A. It was a wonderfully exciting. Surrounded by cuties and adorable families I couldn’t help but clap along in wonderment.

The show relied heavily on audience engagement. Where the tour guide went, we went too. In 90 minutes I got to see Central Park, The Empire State Building, The NY Public Library, The Met, attend Fashion Week, and go to a game for every major New York sports team. At The Met, which I had been to just the day before, we watched Jenna reflect on her desire to be a dancer as she sang “I Could Have Danced All Night” with Edgar Degas’ famous ballerinas. In Central Park, where I had also been just the day before, we watched The Rockettes tap dance in the rain and saw The Alice and Wonderland statue come alive (Amy Olson, how come there’s no statue picture there yet??). During Fashion Week I was entertained by the glitz and glam and also by two of The Rockettes malfunctioning light up blazers (lol). At The Library Tina Fey and Amy Poehler (my heros please I just really want to be both of you at the same time) voiced Patience and Fortitude, the lions standing guard. And at The Empire State Building I tried to ignore the script and songs, it got super cheesy and totally bad, but did enjoy the dancers on wires who were flipping around as Jack and Jenna began to fall for each other as he sang “The Way You Look Tonight”.

There’s no need to be a critic for a show thats only goal is for fun and entertainment (and is obviously a cash cow). At the show I had a lot of fun and was incredibly entertained. The show allowed me to share an experience with my friends where we were all doing something in New York City for the first time. This isn’t a show to go to if you have nothing better to do with your night. It’s a show to go to to smile, sing a long, and have a great time!

I also confirmed at the show that in order to be a Rockette you must be between 5’6’’ and 5’10’’ ½ . I make the cut! I’ll see you next season future audience members at my Radio City Music Hall debut. This year as an audience member, next year as a Rockette.

Friday, February 20, 2015

Guest Post from Kevin Olson! Are classic plays really classic?


Last night I had the wonderful thrill (not an exaggeration) to see the classic Eugene O'Neill play "The Iceman Cometh" -- all 4 hours and 40 minutes of it. This production directed by Robert Falls and produced originally at Chicago’s Goodman Theatre was magnificent and never dull and I did not want it to end. Rather than focus on reviewing that production, it inspires these somewhat undeveloped thoughts.

My family and I are excited to see “Hamilton” the new Lin Manuel-Miranda musical at some point or the soon to open on Broadway “Fun Home” adapted by Lisa Kron and Jeanine Tesori. Both are sophisticated new musical theatre pieces that have opened to rave reviews in the NYT and elsewhere. For many, compared to classic plays, musicals are more accessible both in terms of interest and availability thereby making it easier to commit money, time and effort in order to see them; even in some cases, to make lengthy day-long trips to do so as I did to see this production of “Iceman.”

Many people in my life are avid theatre-goers. Yet some (perhaps many) of them would be reluctant to attend this or any production of "The Iceman Cometh" for many reasons including its length, its heavy-o-sity, the way the play presents women or even the archaic dialects O’Neill uses. At times, I too hesitate to go see plays by Ibsen, Chekov, Shakespeare and others. Why is this so?  I love theatre and so do each of these people in my life.

One answer for me lies in the experiences we have seeing poor, mediocre or even good productions of these classic plays. What do I mean?  When my son was playing the clarinet in middle school, I would go to performances when the small school band was playing. Musically, these concerts were pretty bad if considered only in terms of the quality of performance. Of course, there are many reasons why those performances were significant and fully legitimate arts events. But that can be a subject for another blog entry.
 
But let’s be real, as music, they stunk. My son’s band playing “Appalachian Spring” cannot be compared to how that music would sound when played by the New York Philharmonic.

So too with productions of classic plays that I have seen and in which I have participated. I directed a fairly mediocre production of another O’Neill play, “A Touch of the Poet;” snooze city for that one. And I have sat through countless dull-put-me-to-sleep college, amateur and professional productions of plays by all the classic playwrights. (Musicals too F.Y.I.). And so have those of you reading this blog entry. Taken cumulatively, however, I believe these experiences of the classic drama repertoire create a bias that make it harder and harder to attend classic theatre.

Like symphonies by Mahler, Beethoven and Shostakovich, these plays require tremendous skill in conception and performance in order to allow us to glimpse and uncover their greatness.

So too we cannot fully “get” why classic plays are considered classic unless we commit to seeing the all-too-rare opportunities to see great productions of them. We have to seek them out by scanning reviews from around the world, hoping they are re-mounted somewhere nearby and then hope our ability to actually see them are more than the pipe-dreams so cruelly destroyed in “Iceman.”

And often if the production turns out to be only good, let alone mediocre or poor, we snooze making it that much harder to go see a production of “The Cherry Orchard” or “Long Day’s Journey Into Night.” This summer Audra McDonald is playing Josie Hogan in O’Neill’s “A Moon for the Misbegotten” at the Williamstown Theatre Festival in Massachusetts in the remote northwestern corner of the state. It will sell out quickly most certainly because she is in it. I really hope it is not just a good production but a great one.

I am taking that thought one step further. Concertos are solo performer vehicles. When we go see a play because stars are in it, it may be that concerto experience we are most interested in. Yet any great, revealing production of a classic play is a symphonic experience so our expectations are misdirected. Last night at the Brooklyn Academy of Music, I watched a symphony unfold on stage with all the notes of creaky dialect and dark, nasty themes coming together to make an unforgettable experience that I really did not want to end.

Perhaps this is why classic theatre and the performing arts have such an reputation for elitism -- the chances to experience their greatness are rare. I wish I could afford an expensive bottle of red zinfandel to appreciate the complexity and possibilities of the wine. But I settle for the $10 bottles.
Just a few final thoughts related to “Iceman.”  Nathan Lane was wonderful as was Brian Dennehy and the entire cast. The lights and set design were world-class and should be studied by student designers in classes around the world. But  often what convinces us (me too) to go see a
classic play is because Audra McDonald or Nathan Lane is in it.

I learned from this production inspired in part by reading a review of it in the NY Review of Books that “Iceman” is really a symphony with multiple melodies, tonalities and counter-points slowly revealed over time. It strikes me that this is true for much classic theatre. 

As we listen to the final moments of Beethoven’s 9th Symphony or Shostakovich’s 5th, the closing sounds linger in our consciousness for a time in congregational silence. Then we stand to cheer the ensemble of artists and wish for an encore. I wanted to spend even more time with the residents of Harry Hope’s decrepit saloon in lower Manhattan.

Thursday, February 19, 2015

TBT: Beauty and the Beast vs. The Lion King

Today I'm going to dive into the most middlebrow of all middlebrow topics: ranking Disney musical films from the 1990s. I am going to play my cards immediately by saying that the purpose of this post is to rectify a myth that unfortunately has spread too far and too wide among people from my generation. There is a widespread belief that The Lion King is the best Disney film of the 1990s. This belief rests on nostalgia, false memories of what actually happened in the movie, and the success of the subsequent stage version. Beauty and the Beast is far and away the better film.



Plot and structure: Beauty wins here without a doubt. The plotting and structure of the film is beautiful. The stained glass prologue, followed by the musical introduction of "Belle", to the subtle shifts in character (which are shown, not told), to the pacing of the romance, to the climax and grand finale--every moment fits together beautifully. The Lion King, on the other hand, is much more uneven. It too has a beautiful prologue ("Circle of Life"), but the theme that gets introduced there feels forced onto the material that follows. The romance in Lion King is completely peripheral to the main plot and feels unnecessary. We as an audience are given no compelling reason to root for Mufasa and Simba over Scar. Simba's character development is superficial at best and we are told, not shown, how he grows and matures.



Characters: Since Frozen premiered last year the Disney princess characters of old have gotten a bad rep. Part of that has to do with how the characters are portrayed in the movies. Ariel gives up one of her greatest talents for a chance to be with a man. Sleeping Beauty and Snow White are so passive as to be asleep for half their films while their princes fight off evil witches. What really gave the princess characters a bad rep though was Disney's marketing machine, which turned all of these characters into nothing more than commercial fodder and symbols of "traditional" feminine virtues. The marketing and cultural response to it does a disservice to the characters, Belle from B&B in particular. 

What's Belle's problem, according to these critics? That she has Stockholm Syndrome. The only reason she falls in love with the Beast is because she has a psychological condition which makes her fall in love with her captor, they say. A simple viewing of the film shows that this interpretation doesn't hold water. Belle is not kidnapped: she trades places to save her elderly father. Belle is not trapped in the castle: one of the Beast's true signs of love and selflessness is to let Belle leave to take care of her father. Belle does not fall in love with Beast-as-captor; she only falls in love with him when he changes. He becomes more gracious and giving and way less selfish. The audience sees all of these changes and can understand why Belle's feelings towards him are changing. It's twisting to the film to say she only fell in love because of Stockholm Syndrome.



Simba and Nala are no match for Belle and Beast. Nala is a wasted character without all that much to do. Simba obviously struggles throughout his life, but has no clear character traits and does not undergo the kind of deep change we see Belle and the Beast experience in B&B.



The films are more evenly matched when it comes to villains and side-kick characters. Scar and Gaston are both wonderful villains, but even here Gaston works better into the structure of his film. He is selfish, like the Beast, but has the outer beauty the Beast lacks. Gaston also initially pursues Belle for selfish reasons. Unlike the Beast, Gaston does not change, and serves to emphasize the Beast's character changes. Scar, who is a great character by himself, does no such work to help the overall plot/structure/momentum of The Lion King.



Side-kick characters are great in both. But again Lumiere, Cogsworth, and Mrs. Potts are primarily there to serve the story. They have teeth in the game; they too want to be human again. They offer guidance and support to Belle and the Beast, and serve as a kind of Greek Chorus as their romance progresses. Timon and Pumbaa are there to be...well, Timon and Pumbaa, appealing characters who sing "Hakuna Matata" and who help Simba get over his father's death. But that's it. Like Scar they are great characters by themselves, but don't serve the overall story nearly as well as Beauty's sidekicks do.



Songs: Howard Ashman and Alan Menken wrote such beautiful music for Beauty. People even said that the best musical on Broadway in 1991 was playing in the movie theater. The music serves the story and characters perfectly. "Belle": the perfect exposition. "Be Our Guest": the best animated Busby Berkeley homage you can imagine. "Gaston": such clever lyrics! "Beauty and the Beast": so poignant and beautiful, especially when sung by Angela Lansbury. The Lion King's songs are also memorable and some do their job to serve the story. It's telling, though, that the two most memorable songs, "Circle of Life" and "Can You Feel the Love Tonight", are tacked on. They don't serve the plot, story, or characters. They serve Elton John and Tim Rice's quest for an Oscar (which they got). Beauty obviously wins here too.




Visuals: Okay this one's a tie. Beauty has the stained glass prologue, the cleverness of "Be Our Guest", the computer animated ballroom scene, and the Beast's transformation at the end. Lion King has "Circle of Life" sequence, the wildebeest stampede, and Mufasa in the clouds. Both pretty spectacular examples of animation.




Reception: Lion King had one of the best box offices of all time, and that definitely counts for something, but let's remember that this blog is called "Middlebrow Musings" and there's nothing more middlebrow than the Oscars. Beauty was the first (and until Up [like Lion King, another super overrated movie] the only) animated movie to be nominated for Best Picture at the Oscars. Let's also note that nearly every film critic, when reviewing The Lion King, said it wasn't as good as Beauty and the Beast. Here are some examples.

LA Times: http://articles.latimes.com/1994-06-15/entertainment/ca-4277_1_lion-king
Gene Siskel at Chicago Tribune: http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1994-06-24/entertainment/9406240051_1_young-lion-cub-lion-king-howard-ashman
NY Times: http://www.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9501E0DE163DF936A25755C0A962958260

I like both movies, but B&B is far and away the better film and deserves better in the minds and memories of millennials. 

Sunday, February 15, 2015

Guest post from Laura Landau! Romeo and Juliet at City Ballet


Romeo and Juliet: Shakespeare's classic tale of star-crossed lovers.  A beautifully tragic story for all of New York's cynical romantics on Valentine's day weekend.  I've always loved Prokofiev's Romeo and Juliet score and have seen and enjoyed multiple performances with MacMillen's choreography, so I was excited to see how City Ballet's would compare.  Unfortunately, the performance didn't live up to my Romeo and Juliet expectations. 

The choreography was over-dramatic and didn't fully fill the music, and the staging felt either empty or overcrowded, depending on the scene.  The one set piece impressively transformed from Juliet's bedroom to the balcony to the monastery and finally the Capulet's tomb, but was bulky and distracting.  The balcony scene, always a favorite, didn't have the expressive passionate quality of MacMillen's and didn't take advantage of the building romance in the music.  At the end of the performance, I felt neither moved nor saddened by the families discovering their dead children in the tomb.

Despite this harsh critique, I actually quite enjoyed the performance.  Sterling Hyltin made the most perfect Juliet: tiny and vulnerable, making the most complicated lifts appear effortless.  Her acting pulled me in and she was completely believable as a young girl struggling against her parent's demands and her new-found sexuality.  Robbie Fairchild was unimpressive, but Daniel Ulbricht was an outstanding Mercutio, tackling many jumps and a dramatic death scene.

Overall, while it wasn't the best Romeo and Juliet I've seen, I'm glad I went.  The music alone would have been worth it.  And I love a good tragedy on Valentine's day. 

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

More forays into the world of concert dance: 2013 edition

February 9th, 2013
The Waltz Project, choreography by Peter Martins
Like I said in the previous post, on a whim I purchased a rush ticket for City Ballet's Winter 2013 season. I got extremely lucky with my seat; I was in the front row of the first ring, which is probably the best seat in the house. The first ballet of the evening, The Waltz Project, featured four couples dancing to contemporary American waltz music played on piano choreographed by Peter Martins. The couples had different colored costumes and each had their own personalities. What I remember most was Tiler Peck's playfulness and Teresa Reichlen's grandeur. The woman sitting next to me said, "It's just so beautiful" when it was over.

N.Y. Export: Opus Jazz, choreography by Jerome Robbins
Next up was something totally different, but much more familiar. Opus Jazz is like an abstract West Side Story. The dancers have sneakers on, the girls' hair is loose, and the style, unsurprisingly, is much more jazzy. A highlight here was the third section, which I couldn't help but compare to a dance at a high school gym, each dancer taking a turn to show off his or her skills.

Symphony in Three Movements, choreography by George Balanchine
Before this ballet started the conductor explained some of Stravinsky's influences in writing the music. I don't remember the specifics of the talk too well. I do remember the ballet opening with a powerful image of sixteen women standing in a diagonal line across the stage before the main dancers joined them. One of the sections had a pair of dancers making very particular gestures with their arms, evoking what seemed to be Asian dance traditions. This work comes from a similar milieu as Agon and it was nice to see how Stravinsky and Balanchine came together to create nearly perfectly integrated art. The end of the show was super weird because the lady from Alabama sitting next to me gave me twenty dollars to spend on drinks with my friend afterwards. I was too shocked to return the money, even though I meant to.

February 21st, 2013
The Sleeping Beauty, staging by Peter Martins
Other than that childhood Nutcracker this work was my first full length ballet. The music, by Tchaikovsky, is obviously great. Most of the dance highlights come in act II. The Garland Dance (which uses the "Sleeping Beauty waltz" music) with choreography by Balanchine had what seemed like fifty dancers (including many little girls) weaving around the stage in beautiful patterns without bumping into one another. Unlike my first evening at the ballet, this time I sat in the fourth ring, which, for the Garland Dance in particular, gave me a much better view of the architecture and geometry of the dance. The other dance highlight was watching Sterling Hyltin dance the Rose Adagio. She has to balance on pointe on one foot for extended periods of time multiple times during the movement. It was actually terrifying to watch, but she help up and looked beautiful.

I was less taken with the rest of the piece. There were a lot of non-dance moments. The wake-up scene was incredibly anti-climactic. The witch wasn't all that scary. The role of the Lilac Fairy (the second female lead) is not so well fleshed out. It felt like watching a second-rate Fantasia onstage, especially the sequence of random fairy tale characters dancing at the wedding at the end. Part of me blamed my lack of interest on my lack of knowledge and respect for 19th century Russian ballet traditions, but I'm really not feeling the need to rush back to see "The Sleeping Beauty," except for the two segments noted above.

May 26th, 2013
Fancy Free, choreography by Jerome Robbins
Because of the theme of this afternoon of ballets, it would have been such a good field trip for my Dance in Musical Theater course. It was exactly about the intersection of Broadway and ballet! In fact, two of the three pieces on the program had been extensively discussed in class! The first, "Fancy Free", was a precursor to the musical "On the Town". It still works as a great piece of entertainment with a beautiful pas de deux in the middle that Tiler Peck performed very expressively.

Who Cares?, choreography by George Balanchine
This one is set to a medley of Gershwin music. I liked following the structure, which combined group work, solos, and duets all leading up to a finale with the entire cast. Such fun!

West Side Story Suite, choreography by Jerome Robbins
I actually wasn't crazy about the distillation of West Side Story to just the dance bits. It did give the dancers the opportunity to sing, and there is something special about seeing these dances performed at Lincoln Center, an urban renewal project that replaced the slums of the show. That being said I wasn't sure what the point was. We've seen these dances on film, in numerous Broadway revivals, and in community theater productions all over. Why do we need ballet dancers to do it too?

June 2nd, 2013
Allegro Brilliante, choreography by George Balanchine
Frankly I don't remember much from this ballet other than that one of the four women at the beginning fell down immediately after the curtain rose. Whoops. The funny thing about this afternoon in particular was that while my dad and I were at the ballet together, my sister and my mother were at a Twins Game in Minnesota. As my mom said on Facebook, gender stereotypes be damned! One other thing I remember about this piece was that we saw married couple Megan Fairchild and Andrew Veyette dance as the two leads.

The Cage, choreography by Jerome Robbins
Biology and ballet join forces in this eerie Jerome Robbins piece from the 50s. The women of the Company are a tribe of dangerous insects, luring in male prey to eat. There's a dominant and powerful queen who in this performance was portrayed by Teresa Reichlen whose height made her perfect for the role. There's also a novice who must be initiated into the tribe by killing prey of her own. In her pas de deux with her prey she is initially ambivalent, but in the end biology wins and she goes through with the kill.

Andantino, choreography by Jerome Robbins
This Robbins piece was much less exciting, just a short duet at a slow tempo. It had Tiler Peck though and seeing her is always a highlight.

Stravinsky Violin Concerto, choreography by George Balanchine
I loved this black and white ballet and found the video on City Ballet's YouTube page to be very helpful for directing my gaze during the performance. The use of the heel, the Russian folk-dance quality, and the strange movements in the pas de deux all come through in the video. In general I find NYCB's video introduction to the dances such a valuable tool, taking us into the world of the dancers and helping non-dance people appreciate the works so much more. Here's the Stravinsky Violin Concerto video:



December 15th, 2013
Chroma, choreography by Wayne McGregor
There is so much more in the world of dance in New York than just City Ballet, though it took me a while to take the initiative to explore. One of the greats is Alvin Ailey, the company I had seen on tour in New Bedford. They do an annual holiday season at City Center in New York and my parents and I went together. It was a mixed bill exclusively featuring the work of contemporary choreographers. The first piece, Chroma, used extreme flexibility and the craziest ballet moves in a way that really got the audience going. There was a sharp, bright, white backdrop which added to the extreme feeling of the piece.

Another Night, choreography by Kyle Abraham
A jazzy, fun party. Not as good as a similar, older piece choreographed by Ailey that I saw in New Bedford.

Strange Humors, choreography by Robert Battle
A duet for two men. There was one crazy part when they fell backwards that looked extremely painful. This one was a crowd favorite, but was too short for me to have a real impact.

Minus 16, choreography by Ohad Naharin
I said the last one was a crowd favorite, but maybe nothing other than Ailey's Revelations comes as close to this piece at making the audience go totally nuts. I must say I was completely swept up with the rest of the audience in every moment of this piece. So much of the work is meant to surprise the audience including the choice of music, the costume changes, the transitions, and who participates in the dance. Because of that element of surprise I don't really want to give anything here. Let's just say that it's a must see and if Ailey comes to town or if you're in New York and they're performing this piece please go see it. I promise you will be filled with a kind of goofy, infectious joy that doesn't come around too much in the hoity-toity world of concert dance, or even in life in general. Also, you will never think of the end of the Passover Seder in the same way.

Stay tuned for posts about what the world of dance offered me in 2014.